**IV. The triggering mechanism for El Ni**

**ñ**

**os: The alignment of the lunar line-of-apse with the equinoxes and Solstices of the Earth's orbit.**

**THIS IS THE COVER POST FOR THIS STUDY**

**1. A SUMMARY OF THE THREE PREVIOUS POSTS**

If you are unfamiliar with this topic you may wish to read the following three post in order to understand

this current covering post.

Evidence that El Niño Events are triggered by the Moon - I

I . The Changing Aspect of the Lunar Orbit and its Impact Upon the Earth's Length of Day (LOD).

**Evidence that El Niño Events are triggered by the Moon - II**

II. Seasonal Peak Tides - The 31/62 year Perigee-Syzygy Tidal Cycle.

**Evidence that El Niño Events are triggered by the Moon - III**

III. Strong El Niño Events Between 1865 and 2014.

**Observations of the Earth rate of spin (i.e. LOD) show that there are abrupt decreases in the Earth's rotation rate of the order of a millisecond that take place roughly once every 13.7 days. These slow downs in spin occur whenever the oceanic (and atmospheric) tidal bulge is dragged across the Earth's equator by the Moon. They are produced by the conservation of total angular momentum of the Earth, its oceans and its atmosphere.**

An investigation in the earlier posts revealed that:

a) The lunar distance during its passage across the Earth's Equator determined the size of the (13.7 day) peaks in LOD (i.e. the magnitude of the periodic slow-downs in the rate of the Earth's rotation).

b) The relative sizes of consecutive peaks in LOD were determined by the slow precession of the lunar line-of-apse with respect to the stars, once every 8.85 years.

c) In the years where the lunar line-of-apse were closely aligned with the Solstices, the ratio of the peaks in LOD were close to 1.0 and in the years where the lunar line-of-apse were closely aligned with the Equinoxes, the ratio of the peaks in LOD were far from 1.0 (i.e. near either 0.5 or 2.0).

These series of posts are based upon the premise that El Niño events are triggered by a mechanism that is related to the relative strength of consecutive peaks in the Earth's LOD (corresponding to decreases in the Earth's rotation rate) at the same point in the seasonal calendar.

[N.B. A description of how El Niño events are actually triggered by this mechanism is left to a future paper that will be submitted to a journal for peer-review.]

If this premise is valid, then we should expect to see a pattern in the sequencing of El Niño events that matches that of the 31/62 year Perigee-Syzygy lunar tidal cycle. This particular long-term tidal cycle synchronizes the slow precession of the lunar line-of-apse [which governs the slow change in the Moon's distance as it crosses the Equator] with the Synodic cycle (i.e the Moon's phases) and the seasons.

This study covers all the strong El Niño events between 1865 and 2014. A detailed investigation of the precise alignments between the lunar synodic [lunar phase] cycle and the 31/62 year Perigee-Syzygy cycle, over the time period considered, shows that it naturally breaks up six 31 year epochs each of which has a distinctly different tidal property. The second 31 year interval starts with the

precise alignment on the 15th of April 1870 with the subsequent epoch boundaries occurring every 31 years after that:

Epoch 1 - Prior to 15th April 1870

Epoch 2 - 15th April 1870 to 18th April 1901

Epoch 3 - 8th April 1901 to 20th April 1932

Epoch 4 - 20th April 1932 to 23rd April 1963

Epoch 5 - 23rd April 1963 to 25th April 1994

Epoch 6 - 25th April 1994 to 27th April 2025

Hence, if the 31/62 year seasonal tidal cycle plays a significant role in sequencing the triggering of El Niño events it would be reasonable to expect that its effects for the following three epochs:

New Moon Epoch:

Epoch 1 - Prior to 15th April 1870

Epoch 3 - 8th April 1901 to 20th April 1932

Epoch 5 - 23rd April 1963 to 25th April 1994

**[That have peak seasonal tides that are dominated by new moons that are predominately in the northern hemisphere]**

**Full Moon Epochs:**

Epoch 2 - 15th April 1870 to 18th April 1901

Epoch 4 - 20th April 1932 to 23rd April 1963

Epoch 6 - 25th April 1994 to 27th April 2025

**[That have peak seasonal tides that are dominated by full moons that are predominately in the southern hemisphere]**

**2. Evidence that the Moon Triggers El Ni**

**ñ**

**o Events**

Figure 1 shows the (mean) absolute difference in lunar distance between consecutive transits of the Earth's equator, versus the (mean) longitude of the lunar line-of-apse.

Each of the 65 data point in figure 1 represents a six month time interval, with the intervals arranged sequentially across a period that extends from June 1870 to Nov 1902. The 32 year time period chosen is assumed to be reasonably representative of the 149 year period of this study, which

extends from 1865 to 2014. [N.B. All of the data points shown in figure 1 are obtained by

averaging the plotted values over a six month time interval.]

Shown along the bottom of figure 1 are the months in which the longitude of the lunar line-of-apse aligns with the Sun. This tells us that the line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the Equinoxes when its longitudes are 0 [March] and 180 [September] degrees, and it aligns with the Sun at the Solstices when its longitudes are 90 [June] and 270 [December] degrees.

**Figure 1**

[

**N.B.**The mean longitude of the lunar line-of-apse (averaged over a six month period) moves from left to right across the diagram at roughly 20.34 degrees every six months. This means that it takes 8.85 years (the Cycle of Lunar Perigee) in order to cross the diagram from far left to far right.]

Figure 1 shows that if you were to randomly select a sample of six month time intervals during the years from 1865 to 2014, you would expect that they should (by and large) be evenly distributed along the sinusoidal shown in this plot.

Indeed, if you apply a chi squared test to the data in figure 1, based upon the null hypothesis that there is no difference between number of points within +/- 45 degrees of the time where the lunar line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the Equinoxes, compared to the number of points within +/- 45 degrees of the time where the lunar line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the Solstices, then you find that:

+/- 45 deg. Solstices________33 points

+/- 45 deg Equinoxes_______32 points

expected value = 32.5

total number of points n = 65

degrees of freedom = 1

chi squared = 0.015

and p = 0.902

This means that we are (most emphatically) unable to reject this null hypothesis.

**El Ni**

**ñ**

**o Events During the Full Moon Epochs**

Figure 2 shows the corresponding plot for all the El Niño events that are in the Full Moon epochs

of the 31/62 year Perigee/Syzygy tidal cycle i.e.

Full Moon Epochs:

Epoch 2 - 15th April 1870 to 18th April 1901

Epoch 4 - 20th April 1932 to 23rd April 1963

Epoch 6 - 25th April 1994 to 27th April 2025

Figure 2

As with figure 1, if you apply a chi squared test to the data in figure 2, based upon the null hypothesis that there is no difference between number of points within +/- 45 degrees of the time here the lunar line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the Equinoxes, compared to the number of points within +/- 45 degrees of the time where the lunar line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the Solstices,

then you find that:

+/- 45 deg Equinoxes_______11 points

expected value = 6.5

total number of points n = 13

degrees of freedom = 1

chi squared = 6.231

and p = 0.013

This tells us that we can reject the null hypothesis.

Hence,we can conclude that there is a highly significant difference between number of points within +/- 45 degrees of the time where the lunar line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the Equinoxes, compared to the number of points within +/- 45 degrees of the time where the lunar line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the Solstices.

It is obvious, however, that the robustness of this claim of significance is not very strong, simply because of the small sample size. Indeed, it would only take two extra data points in the +/- 45 deg. Solstices bin to render the result scientifically insignificant [i.e. a chi squared of 3.267 and a probability of rejecting the null hypothesis of 0.071]. Ideally, you would like to have at least double the sample size before you would be a little more confident about the final result.

of the 31/62 year Perigee/Syzygy tidal cycle i.e.

New Moon Epoch:

Epoch 1 - Prior to 15th April 1870

Epoch 3 - 8th April 1901 to 20th April 1932

Epoch 5 - 23rd April 1963 to 25th April 1994

+/- 45 deg. Solstices________9 points

+/- 45 deg Equinoxes_______4 points

expected value = 6.5

total number of points n = 13

degrees of freedom = 1

chi squared = 1.923

and p = 0.166

This tells us that we are unable to reject the null hypothesis. However, the El Niño event that has a mean longitude for the lunar line-of-apse of 135.45 degrees in figure 3 could technically be placed in +/- 45 deg. Solstices bin changing the chi squared to 3.769 and the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis to the scientifically significant value of p = 0.052.

Hence,we can conclude that there is a marginally significant difference between number of points

within +/- 45 degrees of the time where the lunar line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the Equinoxes,

compared to the number of points within +/- 45 degrees of the time where the lunar line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the Solstices.

However, just like the El Niño events in the Full Moon epochs, it is obvious that the robustness of this claim of significance is not very strong, simply because of the small sample size.

The El Niño events have been divided into two sub-samples, consisting of those that are in the New Moon Epochs and those that are in the Full Moon epochs.

Solstice for the two sub-samples drawn from the same parent population (= null hypothesis).

This can be tested by doing a two-tailed Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test that compares the two sub samples.

If we define the New Moon epoch El Niños as sample A and the Full Moon epoch El Niños as sample B, we get:

n(A) =13

n(b) = 13

w(A) = 236

Mu(A) = 175.5

then you find that:

**+/- 45 deg. Solstices________2 points**

+/- 45 deg Equinoxes_______11 points

expected value = 6.5

total number of points n = 13

degrees of freedom = 1

chi squared = 6.231

and p = 0.013

This tells us that we can reject the null hypothesis.

Hence,we can conclude that there is a highly significant difference between number of points within +/- 45 degrees of the time where the lunar line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the Equinoxes, compared to the number of points within +/- 45 degrees of the time where the lunar line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the Solstices.

**The difference is such that****the El Ni****ñ****o events in the Full Moon epochs****preferentially occur near times****when the lunar****line-of-apse aligns with the Sun****at the times****of the Equinoxes**.It is obvious, however, that the robustness of this claim of significance is not very strong, simply because of the small sample size. Indeed, it would only take two extra data points in the +/- 45 deg. Solstices bin to render the result scientifically insignificant [i.e. a chi squared of 3.267 and a probability of rejecting the null hypothesis of 0.071]. Ideally, you would like to have at least double the sample size before you would be a little more confident about the final result.

**El Nino Events During the New Moon Epochs****Figure 3 shows the corresponding plot for all the El Niño events that are in the New Moon epochs**

of the 31/62 year Perigee/Syzygy tidal cycle i.e.

Epoch 1 - Prior to 15th April 1870

Epoch 3 - 8th April 1901 to 20th April 1932

Epoch 5 - 23rd April 1963 to 25th April 1994

**Figure 3**

**As with figure 1, if you apply a chi squared test to the data in figure 3, based upon the null hypothesis that there is no difference between number of points within +/- 45 degrees of the time where the lunar line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the Equinoxes, compared to the number of points within +/- 45 degrees of the time where the lunar line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the Solstices, then you find that:**

+/- 45 deg. Solstices________9 points

+/- 45 deg Equinoxes_______4 points

expected value = 6.5

total number of points n = 13

degrees of freedom = 1

chi squared = 1.923

and p = 0.166

This tells us that we are unable to reject the null hypothesis. However, the El Niño event that has a mean longitude for the lunar line-of-apse of 135.45 degrees in figure 3 could technically be placed in +/- 45 deg. Solstices bin changing the chi squared to 3.769 and the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis to the scientifically significant value of p = 0.052.

Hence,we can conclude that there is a marginally significant difference between number of points

within +/- 45 degrees of the time where the lunar line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the Equinoxes,

compared to the number of points within +/- 45 degrees of the time where the lunar line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the Solstices.

**The difference is such that****the El Ni****ñ****o events in the New Moon epochs****preferentially occur near times****when the lunar****line-of-apse aligns with the Sun****at the times****of the Solstices**.However, just like the El Niño events in the Full Moon epochs, it is obvious that the robustness of this claim of significance is not very strong, simply because of the small sample size.

**Comparing El Ni****ñ****o Events in the Full Moon Epochs****with those in the New Moon Epochs.****Figure 4 shows a histogram of the angle between the lunar line-of-nodes and the position of the nearest solstice for all of the 26 El Niño events in the study sample. This angle, by definition, lies between 0 and 90 degrees.**

The El Niño events have been divided into two sub-samples, consisting of those that are in the New Moon Epochs and those that are in the Full Moon epochs.

**Figure 4****The question is, are the angles between the lunar line-of-nodes and the position of the nearest**

Solstice for the two sub-samples drawn from the same parent population (= null hypothesis).

This can be tested by doing a two-tailed Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test that compares the two sub samples.

If we define the New Moon epoch El Niños as sample A and the Full Moon epoch El Niños as sample B, we get:

n(A) =13

n(b) = 13

w(A) = 236

Mu(A) = 175.5

sigma(A) = 19.5

and z = (W(A) - Mu(A))/Sigma(A)

= 3.103

For a two-tailed solution this means that we reject the null hypothesis at the level of p = 0.002 -

which is highly significant.

which is highly significant.

Hence, since we can say from our earlier results that:

**El Ni****ñ****o events in the****Full Moon epochs****preferentially occur near**

**times**

**when the**

**lunar**

**line-of-apse aligns with**

**the Sun**

**at the times**

**of the Equinoxes**.

We can now also say that:

**El Ni****ñ****o events in****the New Moon epochs must****preferentially****avoid times****when the lunar****line-of-apse****aligns with the Sun****at****the Equinoxes**.**FINAL COMMENTS:**

This study is still a work in progress but already we can make some interesting predictions, which

if fulfilled would reinforce the claim that El Nino events are triggered by the Moon.

The first prediction is that because we are currently in a 31 year Full Moon Epoch for El Niño events,

there should be heightened probability of experiencing a strong El Niño in the following years:

2015-2016 (see figure 1)

2019-2020 and

2024

as these are the years where the lunar line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the times of the Equinoxes.

The second prediction is that, starting sometime around the year 2021, we should begin to see El Niño events that are more typical of the sequencing seen for the New Moon Epochs (i.e. they will be triggered when the line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the times of the Solstices). These times could include:

2022-23 (?) and

2027

Of course, there is always the caveat that we are currently moving into an extended period of low solar activity which could increase the overall intensity of El Niño events out to at least the mid 2030's. However, this could also be accompanied by a decrease in the frequency of occurrence of El Niño events as we move into a period of misalignment between the lunar line-of-nodes and the lunar line-of-apse.

It is interesting to note that the 9 year sequencing of El Nino events in the New Moon Epoch that ended around 1994 i.e.

ReplyDeleteThe El Nino's that occurred in 1982-83, 1991-92 and the missing El Nino in 2000-2001.

should reappear as an El Nino around 2009-10.

Hence, it is possible for one or two El Ninos that you would normally expect to occur in the New Moon tidal epoch to linger into the following Full Moon tidal epoch (i.e from 1994 to 2025).

Thus there is always a possibility that we would get the following 9 year sequence of El Nino:

1982-83

1991-92

2000-01 - missing

2009-10

around 2018.

Since we know so little about this potential triggering mechanism - anything is possible at this stage.

Congratulations on your articles and it is good to see them repeated on Tallbloke.Please keep up the good work.

ReplyDeleteHere is my ~ 9 year year cycle in each corresponding 31 year tidal epoch:

ReplyDeleteA. Full Moon Epochs

1st FULL MOON EPOCH [1870 to 1901]

1877-88 –> 1888-89 –> 1896-97 –> 1905-06 with 1899-1900 as a half cycle

2nd FULL MOON EPOCH [1932 to 1963]

1940-41 –> 1951-52 (weak) –> 1963-64 (weak) with 1957-58 as a half cycle

3rd FULL MOON EPOCH [1993-94 to 2024-25]

1997-98 –> 2006 –>. 2015-16 –> 2024-25 with 2019-20 as a possible half cycle.

B. New Moon Epochs

1st NEW MOON EPOCH [1901 to 1932]

1902-03 –> 1911-12 –> 1918-19 –> 1931-31 with 1925-26 as a half cycle

2nd NEW MOON EPOCH [1963 to 1993-94]

1965-66 –> 1972-73 –> 1982-83 –> 1991-92 with 1987-88 as a half cycle.

IW said

ReplyDelete" I am very sorry that you, Chaeremon, others have been moved off the Workshop thread to this open thread. Unfortunately Ulric was using the posts of others to flood the workshop with his own misunderstandings and confused thinking. Hopefully, you and Chaeremon will be able to bring your expertise to bear in this open thread. I know that I will be tracking what you are saying as the debate evolves.

Ulric is a brilliant man who has a lot to contribute to this topic. Unfortunately, he has the diplomatic skills of a wooden post. He doesn’t seem to appreciate that there are times where he has misunderstood the problem he is criticizing. In these circumstances, no amount of explanation seems to mollify him.

Ulric is correct in saying that a 239 year pattern is a marginally better fit to the long-term changes of the 31 year perigee/syzygy cycle. I actually show this in my paper. However, he misses the point that this is not what I am claiming in my paper.

[Note: A basic underlying assumption in my paper is that tidal forces that peak at the same point in the seasonal calendar are more effective at influencing the climate than peak tides that drift through the tropical year.]

What I find is that the 31 year perigee/syzygy peak tidal cycle slowly drifts through the seasonal calendar. The only reason that I mention the 239/243 year lunar cycle is the fact that it suggested that I investigate the following:

I noticed that every time the north-south drift of Venus (at the times of inferior conjunctions of Venus and the Earth) crossed the Sun’s equator, the slow drift of the 239/243 year lunar through the seasonal calendar passed through roughly the same day of the year. Indeed, this commensurability was so good that it only drifted by -7 +/- 11 hrs over a period of 3,000 years."

“flood the workshop with his own misunderstandings and confused thinking”

Utter lies.

” he has misunderstood the problem he is criticizing.”

More lies.

“Ulric is correct in saying that a 239 year pattern is a marginally better fit to the long-term changes of the 31 year perigee/syzygy cycle.”

I never said anything of the sort, more lies. I said that the 31yr cycle breaks down after 62yrs, it cannot repeat.

“I noticed that every time the north-south drift of Venus (at the times of inferior conjunctions of Venus and the Earth) crossed the Sun’s equator, the slow drift of the 239/243 year lunar through the seasonal calendar passed through roughly the same day of the year. Indeed, this commensurability was so good that it only drifted by -7 +/- 11 hrs over a period of 3,000 years.”

Rubbish, they rapidly fall out of sync and regain sync at 9 Transit cycles. And saying 239 stroke 243 is BS, they don’t match.

Whoa, that is a lot of reading material. I only glanced at a portion of it. You have some interesting thoughts. I have developed an interest in the ENSO changes over the last several years. At the beginning of last year I had a bit of peed off inspired thought set off by conversation with one of the superior intellects who dwell at "The Conversation". That inspiration led me to develop a method which so far has allowed me to correctly forecast the last several positions of the MEI over the previous 12 months, peaks and valleys. I will come back later to spend time perusing your page here. I am interested in lunar connections, mainly in regards to world quakes. Thanks, I'll be back!

ReplyDelete